When planning a lesson, teachers constantly face a dilemma in terms of how it should be structured & what shape it should take. Should they go more of a deductive route, or try something that’s more of a guided discovery approach. Both are valid, but in reality they still put the teacher in control – pulling on the strings, running the show.
When I came across Sheeba Sardar Ali’s 2019 paper from Majma’a University (published in English Language Teaching) I was intrigued to read about Problem‑Based Learning (PBL – yes, another initialism to add to your list). Problem‑based learning has long been part of medical & engineering education: trainee doctors work through patient cases with incomplete information, identify what they need to learn, consult resources, debate diagnoses & propose treatment plans. Engineering students do something similar when they’re handed a design flaw or a structural failure & asked to figure out what went wrong. In both fields, problems aren’t an add‑on to the lesson, they are the lesson. The learning happens through the struggle to make sense of something real.
Applied to ELT, the suggestion is that learners often grow fastest when the task in front of them is just a little too big, too messy, too real.
The study
Ali’s paper is a conceptual & descriptive review rather than an experiment. It draws on classroom observations, prior PBL research & examples from EFL contexts in Saudi Arabia. The study outlines how PBL works: learners tackle ill‑structured problems in small groups, negotiate meaning, research options & present solutions. The teacher acts as facilitator, nudging learners towards autonomy rather than supplying answers. Roles rotate (researcher, note‑taker, presenter) & the problem itself drives the language.
The findings
Ali synthesises evidence showing that PBL supports:
- self‑directed learning habits
- critical thinking & problem‑solving
- communication & collaboration
- deeper engagement with language in social contexts
Although the paper doesn’t report new statistics, it connects to a wider body of research showing that PBL can improve conceptual understanding, confidence, teamwork & authentic language use.
It also highlights predictable challenges: learners unused to open‑ended tasks may feel lost, teachers need training to design suitable problems & group dynamics matter more than we sometimes admit.
Context
Ali’s argument sits comfortably within constructivist traditions (Richardson), task‑based learning (Eckerth & Siekmann) & communicative approaches that emphasise meaning over form. It echoes long‑standing claims in ELT that real‑world complexity pushes learners to mobilise prior knowledge, negotiate meaning & collaborate in ways that tidy textbook tasks rarely achieve.
A quick example: instead of teaching modals of advice through a worksheet, present learners with a local housing dilemma & ask them to propose solutions for a community board. They’ll naturally ‘need’ “You should…” & “You might…” while debating options, but the language emerges from the problem rather than the other way round.
How this differs from TBL
In TBL, the task would typically be shorter, clearer & more tightly framed: learners might plan advice for a friend moving to a new flat, compare rental options or create a checklist for first‑time tenants. The task has a defined end point, & the teacher typically follows it with focused language work. In PBL, the problem is larger & deliberately ill‑structured. Learners investigate causes, research constraints, debate solutions & decide on a course of action. You could argue that TBL is about completing a task; PBL is about understanding a problem. If TBL is a sprint, PBL is more of a hike. The language emerges in both, but the cognitive load, timescale & social complexity are very different.
Teacher takeaways?
- Start small: use short, realistic problems that connect to learners’ lives.
- Train the task: teach collaboration routines before expecting them to happen.
- Expect ambiguity: the messiness is the point, not a flaw.
What do you see as the biggest obstacle to incorporating PBL into your classroom?
Leave a Reply